Jump to content

JP3RKS

Member
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JP3RKS

  1. 17 minutes ago, keithu said:

    It finally happened. Since buying the Multistrada in February the FJ-09 has just been collecting dust in the garage. I posted it for sale on FB marketplace Friday, and about 24 hours later the new owner was loading it up in his trailer. He's a nice younger guy from Olympia, WA and I strongly encouraged him to join this forum.

    It was truly bittersweet to see the FJ go. This was the best all around bike I've had in 30+ years of riding, and definitely the most reliable. I'm sure it will provide many more years of faithful service to the new owner.

    Sounds like your new Multistrada is the best all around bike now. ;)

    I'll admit I have some V4S jealousy! 

  2. 1 minute ago, JP3RKS said:

    Bummer! I was looking forward to seeing another black beauty! Of course they're the fastest! ;)

    (Not sure if you're on a Mac, but you can right click, select quick actions, and convert image. That will give you the option to make a smaller size.)

    Also did a google search for how to do it on PC. Not sure if this helps, but:

     
    Compress pictures to reduce file size
    1. Select the picture or pictures you need to reduce.
    2. Under Picture Tools on the Format tab, select Compress Pictures from the Adjust group. ... 
    3. Select the compression and resolution options and then select OK.
  3. Bummer! I was looking forward to seeing another black beauty! Of course they're the fastest! ;)

    (Not sure if you're on a Mac, but you can right click, select quick actions, and convert image. That will give you the option to make a smaller size.)

  4. On 7/27/2019 at 9:01 AM, superfist said:

    I've got a 2015 FJ-09 and  it drops to half at about 100 miles.  I generally figure about 20 miles per bar (4 bars) and that has worked for me.  Then when the bar is gone, and the dash starts flashing, there's about 20 miles left and I consider this the "Reserve" portion.

    I got 22 miles out of it in the flashing empty section once and put 4.5 gallons in when I got to the station, so I must have been on absolute fumes.  I generally get approximately 200 miles per tank with an average of 44.4 mpg on the display, so it's pretty accurate for my riding habits while daily commuting.

     

    EDit:  Noticed I wandered into the GT forum section from the homepage area.  I wonder if the fuel calculations on the GT version are different.  It would be interesting to see/compare the behavior from others.

    This is my experience on my 2016 as well. Every tank starts out looking like it's going to go for a while because the meter doesn't move, then it drops rapidly after 100 miles.

  5. On 8/25/2020 at 4:59 PM, northsouth said:

    Thank you sir! Yes they are the T-Rex generic highway pegs. Doesn't matter which size clamps as they are not used. They come with 2 different bracket lengths- I used the shorter ones.

    I meant to ask - Is there just one attachment point at the motor mount? If so, is there risk of rotation of the bracket at all?  

  6. Well, I took the new Corbin seat out for a ride today and overall really liking it. I think it prefer it over the Sargent one, for some of the reasons mentioned in the pros/cons. But because I love a good set of bullet points, here ya go!

    • I prefer the taller seat height of the Corbin compared to the Sargent. I can feel just a bit more legroom.
    • The material I got on the Corbin is very grippy. I don't slide around on the saddle.
    • I like the more neutral position.
    • And, could just be a personal preference, but I like the "feel" of the Corbin more.

    I rode the bike up to the top of Mt. Wilson and got some freeway and twisties. Here's a look at the bike overlooking the world!

    (I'll also likely be selling the Sargent one soon.)

    IMG_6306.thumb.jpg.456c0d1746e89d24f3eb538a10c5fc4f.jpg

    • Like 1
  7. I purchased my bike used and it came with a Sargent seat. It has been my first experience with a Sargent. However, I've always had Corbin seats in the past, so I decided to get a Corbin and try both out. I haven't tried the stock seat (didn't come with), so this is just a look at Sargent and Corbin. I will update this after I put some more miles on the Corbin, but for now, here's a look at both, and my thoughts thus far:

    (Also for reference: this is a 2016 FJ09. And, I am 6'2", 34 inch inseam, 180 lbs.)

    SARGENT SEAT  (MSRP: $659)

    Pros: 

    • The look - the red piping is great. (I know you can get this on the Corbin too, but I think I like the look of the Sargent on the bike better.)
    • Lightweight - not sure the actual weights but much lighter than the Corbin.
    • Nice foam - softer feel (that could be a pro or con depending on your preference)
    • Matches stock fit on bike.
    • Adjustable seat positions - like the stock seat, you can choose low setting or high setting.
    • Overall lower sitting position that the stock seat in both positions (but not by much). Could be pro or con depending on your height.
    • Extras - the flashlight and tools underneath the seat are a cool bonus.

    Cons:

    • On the high position, it doesn't feel as "planted" on the bike as in the low position. This could be because you're still connected via the adjustment plastic piece that Yamaha has. 
    • Slight wiggle - if you wiggle the seats and the way they attach to the bike, they have the slightest bit of play in them. I think it's the same as the stock seat.
    • Retains stock "angle" of seat... I feel like I'm still pitched a bit forward, ever so slightly. This might be because it's a SPORT touring, and gives the sporty feel. For me, this is a con. I like a neutral position.
    • Low - I'm tall, and a taller seat height gives me a bit more legroom. So the fact that this is a bit lower than the stock is a con for me.

    CORBIN SEAT (MSRP $618)

    Pros:

    • More of a "cupped" seating feel. You can tell by looking, but the rear seat is higher and gives you more of a slight support in the rear of the driver seat.
    • More neutral seating position. This feels a bit less angled towards the front.
    • Firm seat - This could be a pro or con for you, but I personally like the firmness of the Corbin seats.
    • Tall - I don't think there is an option on the height position (I could be wrong). But even mounted in the low position, it's taller than the tall position of the Sargent (and I think the stock seat too). I'm tall so this is good for me.
    • Solid - Once it's on, it's on. It feels very solid and no wiggle room on the bike (trade off mentioned in cons).
    • Materials - I think you have a greater choice of materials from Corbin.

    Cons:

    • Heavier
    • Getting it on and off the bike. It takes a couple "slams" to really get this to latch into the hooks. 

    OVERALL

    The prices are close, so that's basically a wash. You can get both with or without heat. The Sargent is definitely friendlier to shorter riders and the Corbin is friendlier to taller ones. I think at the end of the day, there isn't going to be a clear winner, just a preference for what each person likes.

    Now, I'm going to go put some miles on and see which one is for me. :)

     

    IMG_6261 Large Medium.jpeg

    IMG_6276 Large Medium.jpeg

    IMG_6262 Large Medium.jpeg

    IMG_6277 Large Medium.jpeg

    IMG_6264 Large Medium.jpeg

    IMG_6278 Large Medium.jpeg

    • Thanks 1
  8. They are definitely heavier. 

    I'm on the taller side (6'2" with 34" inseam) so I was actually wanting more height to give a little more room for my legs. I believe the Sargent is lower than the stock seat in both settings, and from what I understand the Corbin just has one option and that is taller than the tall setting of stock. 

×