Jump to content

estell

Premium Member
  • Posts

    283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by estell

  1. I guess its more of how you ride also, because whether its a car or bike, I dont short shift to third for city driving.  I may end up in 3rd gear but I ride each gear out normally to get there.  Around here, "city driving" is around 35mph, in 3rd gear I would consider that fairly low rpm's with stock gearing.
    All depends on circumstances (obviously)... longer stretch of road allows longer shifts, but in busy traffic I absolutely short shift. Not to be confused with lugging... just not spinning it hard... there's just no need, and no fun unless you can move fast.... IMO.
    I agree with both of you. The FJ09 will happily cruise at 3000 rpm on city streets. While accelerating, it loves to go all the way to 11000. I do both.  
    What I don't get is calling 1st and 2nd gears too short. 1st gear will get to 60 mph, and 2nd will get to 80 mph. You can do a 0 to 60 romp in 2.9 seconds without shifting out of 1st. Is that short-geared?
     
     
  2. So it's been nearly a year. Are you satisfied with this chain? I recently replaced the oem chain at 26,600 along with some other maintenance and replaced it with an EK chain. 

    I am satisfied with the Renthal R4 SRS chain so far. I have put only 6000 miles on it since installing, which is less than half of what I put on the original chain. I am treating it the same, which is not very well, and it is performing fine. I'll reserve final judgment for another 6000 miles.
  3. I prefer to keep the front wheel on the road. I am a bit of a wheelie weenie, probably because I don't have a dirt bike. I gotta admit that it is fun to wheelie with a simple twist of the wrist. However, I would rather accelerate with maximum torque and the wheelie slows down the acceleration. Doesn't it? This bike has been tested 0-60mph in 2.9 seconds. That must be with the front wheel down.
  4. Question; What's the consensus on replacing just the chain or replacing sprockets as well? Rear sprocket looks fine to me.
    I left my rear sprocket too because it didn't show any wear. The drive sprocket was slightly worn at 13K miles. I could barely see the wear when compared side-by-side to a new drive sprocket. I replaced it because the drive sprocket is cheap and easy to replace. [a href=http://sprocketcenter.com/street-sprocket-applications/yamaha/fj-09-2015-2016/525-sprockets-stock-pitch/jt-1591-525-pitch-chromoly-steel-front-sprocket-yamaha.html]www.sprocketcenter.com[/a] 
  5. This is my first chain replacement in about 20 years because my last bike had shaft drive. I haven't seen a chain review here so I thought I'd start one with what I've learned so far. I am sure that many of you could add pages of chain knowledge, but here goes.
     
    The FJ09 uses an O-ring chain, 525 pitch, with 110 links. Mine lasted only 13K miles, which was disappointing. I didn't want to replace it with the same OEM chain, and then again in 13K miles.
     
    I chose a long-life chain with good value, the Renthal R4 SRS Road 525 Chain. Renthal claims that their self-regulating seal (SRS) improves longevity compared to O-ring and X-ring chains.
     
     
    4829578.jpg
     
     
    I bought it from Sport Bike Track Gear because they have a good price at $125. 
     
    I also ordered a basic steel 16-tooth drive sprocket from Sprocket Center
    4829583.jpg
     
     
    The problem that I did not anticipate is that the Renthal chains use a solid rivet pin, which means that the inexpensive chain rivet tools will not work. So instead of using the $30 chain rivet tool that I had already bought from Cycle Gear, I had to buy the Motion Pro Jumbo chain tool AND the Quad Stake Rivet kit. Having to spend another $140 for a rivet tool kit somewhat ruined the value proposition of the Renthal chain. So I hope to get crazy good mileage out of this chain.
     
    If I had known about the tool issue before I bought the chain, then I probably would have purchased a D.I.D. or EK. Those brands use hollow rivet pins that are easier to install with an inexpensive rivet tool.
     
    I have ridden just one day so far with the new chain. All I can say about its performance so far is that it is much quieter and smoother than my old worn-out chain.
     
    Here are a few other observations:
       A few items are required to remove the sprocket: a 30mm socket and an air impact gun. 
       The gold color of the chain doesn't exactly match the color of the forks, but now the forks aren't the only gold on the bike.
       The grease that comes on the chain is really thick and sticky. I tried to wipe it off and didn't have much success. Now it is flinging off while riding and sticking all over. Yuck!
     
     
  6. 38,000 and no unusual noise. ...  Not all FJs have this problem.
    Mine also has no unusual noise at 12K miles. I hear a rattle for about 2 seconds after a cold start and then it quiets down. I figure it takes a few seconds to distribute the oil and that stops the rattle. 
    I have been wondering if my FJ has already had some tensioner service because it has a white dot painted on it as shown in the photo. Does anyone know what the painted dot indicates?
    4789616.jpg
     
     
     
  7. Just curious; what is your weight with riding gear? Luggage/cargo weight? Still running the pathetically soft stock suspension?
    My weight with riding gear is about 220 lbs. My luggage and cargo added another 10 lbs. I am running the stock suspension. The rider sag is adjusted to about 33%. As I recall that is around 41-43mm sag.
    I understand that a suspension upgrade would allow me to ride faster on the same roads. So far I am content with speeds that I can ride on the stock suspension. I will consider less rebound damping the next time I am on a similar road.
     
  8. I don't like many motorcycle boots. Those I've tried are stiff and uncomfortable, especially the full height models. I've been using hiking boots for riding. I almost bought a good work or duty boot for riding, like a Danner or Bates, in order to get more foot protection while still enjoying some comfort when off the bike.
     
    I was finally convinced to get a dedicated riding boot when I found the A-stars Multiair XCR GTX. I like that I can wear them to work without looking like a Power Ranger. Most people probably won't notice that I am wearing a motorcycle boot. These are not full-height but I don't need full-height boots because my Motoport Kevlar pants contain shin armor.
     
    I like that they are quickly fastened by a ratcheting buckle, and that the use of velcro is minimal. Many zippered boots have a large velcro strip that is a hassle to deal with on a daily basis. I like the buckle a lot better. I also like that there is only one buckle because I plan to use these every day and I want to get them on and off quickly.
     
    They are waterproof and breathable with Goretex to keep your feet dry.
    multiair_boots_1.jpg
    I normally wear a size 9.5 (EU44) and I found these to be a little loose. I almost fit into the 9 (EU43), but I chose the larger size so that I could add a comfortable insole.
     
    I didn't find them to be as comfortable as my hiking boots, which is why I haven't had motorcycle boots before now. The insole that Alpinestars provides with the boots is very thin and not so comfy on its own. So I went back to the Danner store and bought the DXT Comfort footbed in size 10, shown below. It is designed to fit into all Danner boots, and fortunately it also fits perfectly into the Alpinestar boot without any trimming. I added the Danner insole to the Alpinestar insole so that the two insoles now fill up the loose space and I ended up with a snug fit, which is perfect. I am happy to report that this insole makes a major improvement in the comfort of the Multiair XCR GTX.
    95914?$09_directory_2x$
     
     
  9. I'll say it first. I like ABS. It is one of many reasons why I chose the FJ-09. I'd like to think that I don't need it, that I will always exercise discipline and good control with the brakes. The reality is that I stomp on the brakes when faced with an emergency situation. I want the ABS to step in and unlock either tire when necessary.
     
    The only time that I crashed my last bike occurred because I locked up the rear. Also, my last car was totaled in a crash that may have been avoided if I had not locked up the brakes. I now have ABS on all my vehicles.
  10. I’d like to avoid cutting the palm of my hand in half when hefting the bike onto its main stand, using the lhs pillion foot-peg bracket to assist the lifting process. 

    I use a simple procedure that my sales guy showed me to get it on the center stand.1. Left hand on left handlebar. 2. Right hand on left passenger hand grip. 3. Right foot on center stand. 4. Shift all your weight onto your right foot, lifting the bike onto the center stand, while guiding with your arms. You don't need to lift much with your arms because your body weight lifts the bike, and your hands don't get cut by the hand-holds.
     
  11. You mention you were getting 48+MPG......I used to get that no problem. All a sudden lately, I struggle to get 42-43 MPG average. Nothing has changed in my riding style. Bike only has 4700 miles on it. What do you think could be the cause of my issue? Does the dealer need to be looking at something for me?[span]     
    [/span]
    Could it be the colder temps? I have noticed that my mileage is lower and the coolant temp gauge doesn't get above about 140-150. The ECU is likely running a rich fuel mixture, thus reducing mileage. Should improve with warmer days.
  12. By looking through the comments and reviews from fellow riders here. Can see that the cal sci touring screen does a better job in deflecting the wind, reduce noise, buffeting and turbulence. Any more cal sci screen user able to give more reviews on the riding experience?
    The wind noise is drastically lower with my large Cal Sci screen. Now the dominant noise is the engine and induction instead of the wind.  
×